parseerror Posted May 17, 2012 Report Share Posted May 17, 2012 I am unable to "create a new topic" in "Feature Requests" for some reason, so I posted here. Hope that's ok.Ordering of peers in the "Peer" window seems unnecessarily unstable.For example if I sort on "Up Speed" and there are a large number of peers with an empty (presumably 0) value, they still shuffle around wildly. I assume this is the side effect of the ordering implementation, which I further assume is using an unstable implementation of qsort().I propose that peers (and any other list for human consumption, really) be ordered by a stable sort. It's reasonably what a user expects and easier to keep track of a given item between updates.There are a variety of well-understood, adequately performant stable sorts available.Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harold Feit Posted May 17, 2012 Report Share Posted May 17, 2012 Speeds below a certain point aren't differentiated in the interface but ARE when sorting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.