parseerror Posted May 17, 2012 Report Share Posted May 17, 2012 I am unable to "create a new topic" in "Feature Requests" for some reason, so I posted here. Hope that's ok.Ordering of peers in the "Peer" window seems unnecessarily unstable.For example if I sort on "Up Speed" and there are a large number of peers with an empty (presumably 0) value, they still shuffle around wildly. I assume this is the side effect of the ordering implementation, which I further assume is using an unstable implementation of qsort().I propose that peers (and any other list for human consumption, really) be ordered by a stable sort. It's reasonably what a user expects and easier to keep track of a given item between updates.There are a variety of well-understood, adequately performant stable sorts available.Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.